Questionnaire for stakeholders

Hitta på sidan

Questions about Policy Area Hazards.

Background

The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region was first approved in 2009 and is an agreement between the European Commission and the EU member states bordering the Baltic Sea: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Sweden. It fosters cooperation and finds common solutions to joint challenges on a macro-regional level.

Policy Area Hazards is part of the strategy under the “Save the Sea” objective. The Action plan in place dates from 2021. An update of the actions is currently under-way, to make the strategy more coherent and stringent, and actions up to date with today’s challenges.

PA Hazards has worked on updating its actions together with its Steering Group and other stakeholders through workshops. A first draft was adopted by the PA Hazards Steering Group on 18 December 2024. The National Coordinators Group approved the draft actions on 18 May 2025. Now, we move into the last phase of the update, and we would like to hear your opinions!

PA Hazards has kept the current structure of two actions, however, focus areas have been added and indicators are changing significantly to streamline with other Policy Areas.

Overview of PA Hazards actions

Microplastics

Microplastics was added as an important focus area under Action 1. Microplastics is not present as a topic otherwise in the EUSBSR strategy, and meanwhile, new monitoring requirements are introduced through the revised urban wastewater treatment directive and the REACH regulation. The HELCOM regional action plan for marine litter underlines the need for work on this topic further.

Circular economy approach to chemicals, including nutrients

Mentioned in the 2021 Action plan as well, however, the revision aims to clarify what aspects of the work is important to be addressed by PA Hazards, to work complementary with PA Nutri, which is working on nutrient recycling.

Risk of acute pollution by oil and other substances

Risk of acute pollution by oil and other substances was included in the previous version. PA Maritime Safety supports cross-border collaboration in case of accidents, including oil spills or other fuels under their Action 4. PA Hazards aim to complement these efforts by supporting knowledge building activities on the effect on the marine environment.

lista över farliga ämnen





Over-arching questions
1. What in your opinion would be the most important type of support by PA Hazards? What would give most added value to have macroregional cooperation? Please pick the five most important. * (obligatorisk)
1. What in your opinion would be the most important type of support by PA Hazards? What would give most added value to have macroregional cooperation? Please pick the five most important.









2. Which of PA Hazards focus area(s) are most relevant to your work? (choose 1-3) * (obligatorisk)
2. Which of PA Hazards focus area(s) are most relevant to your work? (choose 1-3)






Action 1: Prevent pollution and reduce the use of hazardous substances
3. The Steering Group decided to add “microplastics” as a focus area for PA Hazards. To which extent do you think that it is relevant to work on this topic at EUSBSR level?
3. The Steering Group decided to add “microplastics” as a focus area for PA Hazards. To which extent do you think that it is relevant to work on this topic at EUSBSR level?






4. How should PA Hazards support work on microplastics?
4. How should PA Hazards support work on microplastics?





5. How should PA Hazards support work on PFAS? Pick up to three alternatives.
5. How should PA Hazards support work on PFAS? Pick up to three alternatives.







6. How should PA Hazards support work on Pharmaceuticals in the environment!
6. How should PA Hazards support work on Pharmaceuticals in the environment!





Action 2: Mitigate new and remediate historic contamination
7. What is the most important topic in your opinion?
7. What is the most important topic in your opinion?





8. How should PA Hazards support work on contaminated sediments?
8. How should PA Hazards support work on contaminated sediments?




9. How should PA Hazards best support work on submerged objects and munitions
9. How should PA Hazards best support work on submerged objects and munitions




10. How should PA Hazards best support actions related to recycling of nutrients?
10. How should PA Hazards best support actions related to recycling of nutrients?


11. How should PA Hazards best support actions related to risks associated with acute pollution by oil and other harmful substances?
11. How should PA Hazards best support actions related to risks associated with acute pollution by oil and other harmful substances?




Climate aspects
12. Do you agree that more information is needed on how hazardous substances behave in a warmer climate, and how they react in water and stored in sediments?
12. Do you agree that more information is needed on how hazardous substances behave in a warmer climate, and how they react in water and stored in sediments?





13. Which HELCOM indicators do you find most relevant to use as impact indicators under Action 1?
13. Which HELCOM indicators do you find most relevant to use as impact indicators under Action 1?







14. How relevant do you find the following HELCOM to use as impact indicators for Action 2?
14. How relevant do you find the following HELCOM to use as impact indicators for Action 2?




Other questions



logotyp för medfinansiering av eu
  • Louise Floman
  • Utredare
  • Havsmiljöenheten
  • Tel: 010-6986332
  • Vill du skicka e-post? Öppna ditt e-postprogram, skriv personens fornamn.efternamn (med punkt mellan namnen) och lägg till adressen @havochvatten.se
  • Louise Floman
  • Utredare
  • Havsmiljöenheten
  • Tel: 010-6986332
  • Vill du skicka e-post? Öppna ditt e-postprogram, skriv personens fornamn.efternamn (med punkt mellan namnen) och lägg till adressen @havochvatten.se
Publicerad: 2025-09-22
Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion